We Asked, You Said, We Did

• How you use River Basin Management Plans (RBMPs) and what information is difficult to find?
• How can we collaborate with you and which organisations, plans, or strategies should be included.
• How could we better link protected areas with RBMPs?
• We shared our timetable to update the Cycle 4 RBMPs for 2027.

• You suggested organisations we should work with as well as  plans and strategies to integrate into RBMPs.
• You felt that timescales are long.
• The published River Basin Management Plans are complex, technical and difficult to digest.
• You value local narrative that is more specific to your local waterbody.
• You find information about protected areas hard to find and want this to be presented more consistently. You also want to see closer links to links to Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) Core Management Plans
• We need to make it easier to find data about protected areas, provide and present the data in a more consistent way. 
• You told us the Nutrient Management Boards in Wales work for the SAC Rivers is important.
• You are concerned about the gaps in evidence and the need to integrate Protected Area actions in the programme of measures.
• Feedback relating to monitoring, data, evidence and governance.
• We received 34 responses.

• We have considered  your responses and discussed them with other teams within NRW.
• We have updated our Protected Area Register with newly designated bathing waters.
• To make it easier to find information we have updated Water Watch Wales with the SAC River compliance data alongside the Cycle 3 interim Water Framework Directive Regulations classification.
• We are working on the Marine Protected Area condition assessments integrating Water Framework Directive Regulations nutrient and chemicals data where appropriate (to be published in the summer).
• We note your concerns about timescales. They are set out in legislation. However, government is considering the future of RBMPs. We will feed your concerns into the current Independent Water Commission review. Meanwhile we will continue to progress work.
• We are adapting our next steps to reflect your feedback.  We are making changes to improve clarity and accessibility.
• We aim to include more maps and interactive datasets to help people better understand issues in their local waterbodies.
• We will consider your wider feedback in future consultations.

Your help and feedback are invaluable. Please continue to work with us. Our next opportunity to comment is our Challenges and Choices consultations on Wales’s Significant Water Management Issues autumn 2025 and the Draft River Basin Management Plan in summer 2026.

If you have any questions before our next consultation please email us at wfdwales@cyfoethnaturiolcymru.gov.uk  

Do you agree with our approach to use standard rules to cover the new activities?

Do you understand the requirements of the proposed standard rules?

Do you agree with the requirements of the proposed standard rules?

Please let us know what you think would prevent people from using the proposed standard rule sets.

Do you agree that the waste quantity limits are viable?

Do you agree that the waste storage duration limits provide a viable throughput?

Do you believe the requirements for having certain activities carried out inside a building are proportionate to the pollution risks?

Please list any other types of treatment or processing activities that you believe should be included in the standard rule sets.

Do you agree that the right waste codes have been listed? If no, please let us know which ones to include and why.

Would the exclusion distances from receptors prevent you from finding a site from which to operate?

Please let us know your views on our proposals for operating techniques in Table 2.3, relating to the site's surfacing and drainage requirements, and where different types of waste can be stored or treated.

An alternative option for the operating techniques would be to require all waste to be stored and treated on an impermeable surface with a sealed drainage system at all times. Would you support this option? If so, why?

Do you intend to apply for one of the standard rules sets when published?

Do you think the introduction of the new standard rules sets or the revisions to the existing standard rules sets will have a significant financial impact overall on your business?

Do you agree with the addition of the new waste codes for SR2008 No 12 and SR2008 No 13?

A number of responses disagreed with the proposed changes to the exemptions regime.

There were a number of responses expressing concern that the exemption changes may impact on the ability of small businesses to operate and for Local Authorities to meet their recycling targets. One respondent proposed a new type of interim permit/exemption which is registered and paid for similar to current WEEE exemption.

There was a need for clear and concise communications relating to any changes in respect of permitting.  Respondents also expressed concerns that the location criteria for the SRPs were too restrictive, for example in comparison to the older SRPs

It was suggested that there could be ‘Standard Rules Fire Prevention (and Mitigation) Plans’ to speed up the processing of applications.

Concerns were expressed that no new SRP has been introduced to replace the T9 exemption which is being removed as part of the exemptions review

There was a comment about alignment with other requirements, such as fire prevention and mitigation plan (FPMP) guidance regarding storage of waste limits.

There was a request to include farm plastics in SR2024 No.3.

The importance of definitions was raised.

There was a comment that requiring an impermeable surface may be onerous for some applicants who may handle very low risk wastes.

A number of responses disagreed with the proposed changes to the exemptions regime, which are not in the scope of this consultation. Those changes have been consulted on separately by Welsh Government and DEFRA. This consultation is limited to the introduction of the three new SRPs and amendments to two existing SRPs.

Most respondents support these Standard Rules Permits (SRPs) in general, and in particular as a pragmatic approach as a response to the proposed changes to waste exemptions. 

There were a number of responses expressing concern that the exemption changes may impact on the ability of small businesses to operate and for Local Authorities to meet their recycling targets. One respondent proposed a new type of interim permit/exemption which is registered and paid for similar to current WEEE exemption. Again, these issues are beyond the scope of this consultation.

We note the responses highlighting the need for clear and concise communications relating to any changes in respect of permitting.  Respondents also expressed concerns that the location criteria for the SRPs were too restrictive, for example in comparison to the older SRPs We are working to review all our SRPs to ensure consistency.

One respondent suggested providing ‘Standard Rules Fire Prevention (and Mitigation) Plans’ to speed up the processing of applications. We don’t support the introduction of Standard Rules Fire Prevention and Mitigation Plans. While SRPs are not site specific, an operator must understand and explain clearly how they will manage waste on site to reduce fire risk. We believe the best method to understand and mitigate the risk posed by the activity is to work through the FPMP process and produce an FPMP. We are also concerned that the Fire and Rescue Services across Wales and insurance industry may see this as increasing the risk of fires, which have been a high-profile issue in recent years.

Concerns were expressed that no new SRP has been introduced to replace the T9 exemption which is being removed as part of the exemptions review. We are satisfied that our SRP SR2011 no. 2 is already in place to handle scrap metal and most T9 operations should be able to use this existing SRP.

We note the comment about alignment with other requirements, such as fire prevention and mitigation plan (FPMP) guidance regarding storage of waste limits. The storage limits are based on the risk profile posed by the activity and explained in the Generic Risk Assessment. It should also be noted that the FPMP guidance is currently under review and we will monitor any changes to amend SRPs as required should there be inconsistencies.

There was a request to include farm plastics in SR2024 No.3. We have now added List of Waste code 02 01 04 for waste plastics (except packaging) to this SRP.

We note the comments on the importance of definitions. For example for surfacing – in particular the difference between ‘hardstanding’ and ‘impermeable surface’. These definitions are already provided for each of the SRPs. Where we find any terms that are unclear to operators, we can consider providing definitions in future.

There was a comment that requiring an impermeable surface may be onerous for some applicants who may handle very low risk wastes. However, for most waste types an impermeable surface is only mandatory within Source Protection Zone 2. Otherwise,  waste can be kept on hardstanding, provided the risk from this is fully assessed and dealt with in the operator’s management system.

All the respondents who answered question 18 agreed with the addition of the new waste codes for SRPs SR2008 No 12 and SR2008 No 13.

Based on the consultation responses received, we have decided to publish the three new and two amended rulesets. We will continue to review the permitting process including experiences arising from these new and amended permits.

Fe ofynnon ni am eich sylwadau ar y Cynllun Adnoddau Coedwig ar gyfer Ystad Goetir Llywodraeth Cymru yng Ngogledd Dyffryn Gwy. Mae’r Cynllun Adnoddau Coedwig yn gynllun lefel uchel sy’n pennu’r gwaith rheoli ar gyfer y coetiroedd, gan gyflwyno’r amcanion hirdymor ar gyfer pob un o’r coetiroedd (adfer coetir hynafol, rheoli coetir brodorol, neu waith rheoli coedwigaeth safonol, er enghraifft), a’r ymagwedd gyffredinol at unrhyw ailstocio, er enghraifft gyda rhywogaethau llydanddail brodorol neu goed conwydd. Ond nid yw’r cynllun yn ymdrin â gwaith rheoli penodol yr ystâd o ddydd i ddydd. Ein Tîm Rheoli Tir a Gweithrediadau Coedwig sy’n gwneud hyn, ac mae eu gwaith yn helpu i lywio’r cynllun.

Fe ddaeth niferoedd eithaf uchel o ymatebion i’r ymgynghoriad hwn i law, gyda 15 o bobl yn cynnig sylwadau, sy’n dangos faint mae pobl yn gwerthfawrogi’r coetiroedd yn Nyffryn Gwy. Diolch i bawb a roddodd o’u hamser i ymateb. Fe gawsom rywfaint o adborth hefyd yn ein sesiwn galw heibio yn y Narth ym mis Rhagfyr.

Roedd cefnogaeth eang i’r nodau i adfer a rheoli coetir lled-naturiol hynafol ar yr ystâd, gwella bioamrywiaeth, a chynyddu niferoedd y coed llydanddail brodorol yn y coetiroedd.

Roedd rhai o’r ymatebion yn mynegi pryderon ynghylch cynnal a chadw llwybrau troed yng nghoetiroedd Gogledd Dyffryn Gwy ac roedd rhai yn pryderu am ansawdd dŵr Afon Gwy a sut mae coedwigaeth o bosib yn cyfrannu at hynny ac eisiau sicrhau bod hyn yn cael ei ystyried a’i reoli’n briodol. Codwyd rhai pryderon hefyd ynghylch sbesimenau penodol neu grwpiau o goed arbennig yn y coetiroedd a beth fyddai’n digwydd iddyn nhw.

Roedd rhywfaint o anfodlonrwydd ynghylch defnyddio cerbydau oddi-ar-y-ffordd yn y goedwig a’r difrod maen nhw’n ei achosi, a hefyd roedd cwestiynau ynghylch rheoli baeddod gwyllt.

Rydym wedi rhoi sylw i’r sylwadau a dderbyniwyd ac maent wedi’u rhannu â thimau perthnasol o fewn Cyfoeth Naturiol Cymru fel y gellir, lle bo modd, eu gweithredu neu eu cofnodi i’w hystyried ar gyfer gwaith rheoli yn y dyfodol. Mae lefel y diddordeb yn y Cynllun Adnoddau Coedwig hwn yn arwydd o’r gwerthfawrogiad o’r coetiroedd yn lleol a chan ymwelwyr, o ran hamdden ac iechyd a lles. Mae hynny’n rhywbeth rydyn ni am ei gefnogi a’i annog.

Lle bo’r geiriad yn yr amcanion heb fod yn glir, er enghraifft ‘isadeiledd’, rydym wedi ceisio addasu hyn ac rydym hefyd wedi ychwanegu amcan penodol yn ymwneud â chynnal a chadw llwybrau troed.

Rydym yn sylweddoli bod yna rywfaint o bwysau yn sgil gweithgareddau hamdden sy’n peri pryder, ac rydym yn gweithio’n galed i newid hyn ac i annog gweithgareddau hamdden cyfrifol. Dylid rhoi gwybod am unrhyw achosion o ymddygiad gwrthgymdeithasol, er enghraifft gyrru yn anghyfreithlon oddi ar y ffordd, i’n llinell gymorth digwyddiadau (03000 65 3000) ac am unrhyw weithgareddau anghyfreithlon i’r llinell gymorth a/neu’r heddlu drwy ffonio 101. 

Codwyd rhai pryderon ynghylch gweithgareddau coedwigaeth a’u heffaith ar ddŵr ffo ac erydiad pridd, yn enwedig mewn perthynas ag Afon Gwy. Mae gweithgareddau coedwigaeth yn dilyn arferion gorau i leihau’r effeithiau ar yr amgylchedd lleol, ac er y gallant edrych yn hyll weithiau, cânt eu gwneud yn unol â Safon Coedwigaeth y DU a Chynllun Sicrwydd Coetiroedd y DU. Mae Safon Coedwigaeth y DU yn rhoi arweiniad i sicrhau bod dŵr ffo yn cael ei reoli’n briodol, a dilynir yr arweiniad hwn yn ystod ein holl weithrediadau. Mae’n rhaid i ni wneud gwaith cwympo coed yn ystod misoedd y gaeaf pan fydd hi’n wlypach, er mwyn cydymffurfio â deddfwriaeth rhywogaethau a warchodir, er mwyn osgoi amharu ar rywogaethau fel pathewod neu adar yn ystod y tymor nythu.

Rydym yn gweithio’n galed i gydbwyso’r gofynion ar Ystad Goetir Llywodraeth Cymru a’r tri amcan a nodir yn Coetiroedd i Gymru: Strategaeth Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer Coetiroedd a Choed (2018), eu bod yn darparu buddion i gymunedau, i fioamrywiaeth a’r amgylchedd, ac i’r economi. Rydym hefyd yn gweithio’n galed i fynd i’r afael â’r heriau sy’n codi yn sgil clefydau fel Phytophthora ramorum, sydd wedi effeithio ar goed llarwydd, ynghyd â chlefyd coed ynn a chlefydau eraill sy’n effeithio ar wytnwch y coetiroedd.

We asked for your comments on the Forest Resource Plan for the Welsh Government Woodland Estate in the northern Wye Valley. The Forest Resource Plan is a high level plan that determines the overall management of the woodlands, setting out the long term objectives for each woodland (ancient woodland restoration, native woodland management, or standard forestry management, for example), and the general approach to any restocking, such as with native broadleaf or coniferous species. But the plan does not go into the specific day to day management of the estate, this is provided by our Land Management and Forest Operations Team whose work the plan informs.

We had a fairly high level of responses to this consultation with 15 people taking the time to provide comments, showing how much people value the woodlands in the Wye Valley. Thank you to everyone who took the time to respond. We also had some feedback at our drop-in session in The Narth back in December.

There was broad support for the aims to restore and manage ancient semi natural woodland on the estate, improve biodiversity and increase the amount of native broadleaves within the woodlands. 

We had some responses with concerns over the maintenance of footpaths within our Wye Valley North woodlands and some responses were concerned about the water quality of the River Wye and how forestry may contribute to that and wanting to make sure this was factored in and managed accordingly. There were also a few concerns raised over specific specimens or groups of special trees within the woodlands and what would be happening with them.

There was some dissatisfaction about the use of the forest by off-road vehicles and the damage they are causing and also questions around Wild Boar management.

We have taken the comments received on board and they have been shared with relevant teams within Natural Resources Wales so that where possible they can be actioned or recorded to be taken into consideration for future management. The level of interest in this FRP shows how much the woodlands are valued locally and by visitors for recreation and health and wellbeing which is something we want to support and encourage.

Where wording in the objectives has not been clear, such as ‘infrastructure’ we have tried to amend this and we have also added in a specific objective around footpath maintenance.

We realise that there are certain recreational pressures that are a concern and we are working hard to change this and encourage responsible recreation. Any issues of anti social behaviour, such as illegal off-roading, should be reported to our incident hotline (03000 65 3000) and any illegal activity to the hotline and/or the police via 101. 

There were some concerns raised around forestry activities and their impact on water runoff and soil erosion, particularly in relation to the River Wye. Forestry activities follow best practice to minimise impacts on the local environment, and although can sometimes look unsightly, is carried out in line with the UK Forestry Standard and UK Woodland Assurance Scheme. The UK Forestry Standard provides guidance to ensure water run off is managed appropriately, which is followed during all our operations. We have to carry out felling operations in winter months when it is wetter to comply with protected species legislation, so we do not disturb or affect species such as dormice or birds during nesting season.

We are working hard to balance the demands on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate and the three objectives as set out in the Woodlands for Wales: The Welsh Government’s Strategy for Woodlands and Trees (2018), that they provide benefits for communities, for biodiversity and the environment, and for the economy. We are also working hard to meet the challenges provided by diseases such as Phytophthora ramorum, which has impacted larch, ash die back, and other diseases that are affecting the resilience of the woodlands.

We asked for your comments on the Forest Resource Plan for the Welsh Government Woodland Estate in the Heads of the Valleys region. The Forest Resource Plan is a high level plan that determines the overall management of the woodlands, setting out the long term objectives for each woodland (ancient woodland restoration, native woodland management, or standard forestry management, for example), and the general approach to any restocking, such as with native broadleaf or coniferous species. But the plan does not go into the specific day to day management of the estate, this is provided by our Land Management and Forest Operations Team whose work the plan informs.

Thank you to everyone who took the time to respond.

There was broad support for aims to restore and manage ancient semi natural woodland on the estate, improve biodiversity, and increase the area of native broadleaves within the woodlands.

Some responses were concerned about the situation at Arail Bank and the impact the larch is having on local residents.

Some responses were concerned about the impact of unauthorised bike trails on the woodlands. One asked about natural flood management solutions on the estate, and another proposed working closely with partners to improve biodiversity.

We have taken the comments received on board and they have been shared with relevant teams within Natural Resources Wales. The level of interest in this FRP shows how much the woodlands are valued locally and by visitors for recreation and health and wellbeing which is something we want to support and encourage.

Arail Bank is a complicated woodland that has a number of issues that are impacting on its management. This includes access issues, landslip hazards, fissures, and disused mine workings. We are trying to identify a way forward for the management of Arail Bank but this will take some time.

We are working hard to balance the demands on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate and the three objectives as set out in the Woodlands for Wales: The Welsh Government’s Strategy for Woodlands and Trees (2018), that they provide benefits for communities, for biodiversity and the environment, and for the economy. We are also working hard to meet the challenges provided by diseases such as Phytophthora Ramorum, which has impacted larch, ash die back, and other diseases that are affecting the resilience of the woodlands.

We asked for your comments on the Forest Resource Plan for the Welsh Government Woodland Estate in the southern Wye Valley. The Forest Resource Plan is a high level plan that determines the overall management of the woodlands, setting out the long term objectives for each woodland (ancient woodland restoration, native woodland management, or standard forestry management, for example), and the general approach to any restocking, such as with native broadleaf or coniferous species. But the plan does not go into the specific day to day management of the estate, this is provided by our Land Management and Forest Operations Team whose work the plan informs.

We had a high level of responses to this consultation showing how much people value the woodlands in the Wye Valley. Thank you to everyone who took the time to respond.

There was broad support for aims to restore and manage ancient semi natural woodland on the estate, improve biodiversity, and increase the amount of native broadleaves within the woodlands.

Some responses were concerned about water run-off and the impact of felling operations on this, and soil erosion, and wanting to make sure this is factored in and managed accordingly.

There was some dissatisfaction about the classification of unauthorised mountain biking on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate as anti-social behaviour in the same objective as fly tipping and illegal 4x4 use.

We have taken the comments received on board and they have been shared with relevant teams within Natural Resources Wales. The level of interest in this FRP shows how much the woodlands are valued locally and by visitors for recreation and health and wellbeing which is something we want to support and encourage.

We realise putting mountain biking in the same sentence as fly tipping might not have been taken well, however this was focused on irresponsible trail building and use of mountain bikes that damage the woodland ecosystem, create conflicts with other woodland users, and prevents management activities, not mountain biking in general. We are keen to encourage responsible mountain biking where possible on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate. In future we will be clearer in our language when discussing such issues.

We had several questions concerning forestry activities and their impact on water runoff and soil erosion. Forestry activities follow best practice to minimise impacts on the local environment, and although can sometimes look unsightly, is carried out in line with the UK Forestry Standard and UK Woodland Assurance Scheme. The UK Forestry Standard provides guidance to ensure water run off is managed appropriately, which is followed during all our operations. We have to carry out felling operations in winter months when it is wetter to comply with protected species legislation, so we do not disturb or affect species such as dormice or birds during nesting season.

We are working hard to balance the demands on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate and the three objectives as set out in the Woodlands for Wales: The Welsh Government’s Strategy for Woodlands and Trees (2018), that they provide benefits for communities, for biodiversity and the environment, and for the economy. We are also working hard to meet the challenges provided by diseases such as Phytophthora Ramorum, which has impacted larch, ash die back, and other diseases that are affecting the resilience of the woodlands.

We asked for your comments on the Forest Resource Plan for the Breidden which is a mixture of privately owned woodland and some Welsh Government Woodland Estate all managed by Natural Resources Wales. The Forest Resource Plan is a high level plan that determines the overall management of the woodlands, setting out the long term objectives for each woodland (ancient woodland restoration, native woodland management, or standard forestry management, for example), and the general approach to any restocking, such as with native broadleaf or coniferous species. But the plan does not go into the specific day to day management of the estate, this is provided by our Land Management and Forest Operations Team whose work the plan informs.

We had a low level of responses to this consultation with only 3 people taking the time to provide comments. However, we know that these woodlands are important due to the number of visitors every year. Thank you to everyone who took the time to respond.

There was support for the objectives of the plan with aims to identify, protect and maintain historic features, expand the amount of native broadleaf and enhance biodiversity.

There were concerns over the maintenance of footpaths within the Breidden plan and disappointment that this wasn’t included as an objective and there was some dissatisfaction about the name of the plan being Welshpool, as opposed to the Breidden, as the site is known locally.

We have taken the comments received on board and they have been shared with relevant teams within Natural Resources Wales so that where possible they can be actioned or recorded to be taken into consideration for future management.

We have updated the objectives to include “Maintain and improve visitors experience by providing a safe and enjoyable diverse environment. Public rights of way and other open access areas of the plan are well maintained, and this should continue. The continued management under LISS with more areas recruited in the future and other areas of gradually restoring ancient woodland will enhance the aesthetics of the forest in the long-term.”

The decision has also been made to change the name of the plan to the Breidden Forest Resource Plan.

We are working hard to balance the demands on the woodland to provide benefits for communities, for biodiversity and the environment, and for the economy. We are also working hard to meet the challenges provided by diseases such as Phytophthora Ramorum, which has impacted larch, ash die back, and other diseases that are affecting the resilience of the woodlands.

We asked for your comments on the Forest Resource Plan for the Welsh Government Woodland Estate in the region of the Lower Taff Valley and The Vale of Glamorgan. The Forest Resource Plan is a high level plan that determines the overall management of the woodlands, setting out the long term objectives for each woodland (ancient woodland restoration, native woodland management, or standard forestry management, for example), and the general approach to any restocking, such as with native broadleaf or coniferous species. But the plan does not go into the specific day to day management of the estate, this is provided by our Land Management and Forest Operations Team whose work the plan informs.

We had a high level of responses to this consultation showing how much people value the woodlands in the area.

It was clear that there is a high level of use in some of the woodlands for recreation including walking and mountain biking, and many responses want to see this use supported more, although some responses said there was not enough detail about this in the plans, with no mention of public access.  There was also a perception this use could be negatively impacted by woodland management activities. However, there were also some responses that expressed concern about the level of mountain biking in some woodlands and the impact this could have on other users and the woodland environment.

There were comments expressing concern about perceived negative impacts of tree felling activity on the local environment and the communities near to the woodlands. There were also questions about the practical aspects of any felling, such as where the extraction routes will be, and disruption to local communities during operations.

There was broad support for aims to restore ancient semi natural woodland on the estate and improve biodiversity within the woodlands, and there were some responses that wanted more native trees and less conifer species. Some responses asked for more connectivity between the woodlands in the plan, and other woodlands nearby. Some requested a more gradual approach from conifers to broadleaves rather than clearfelling.

There was some dissatisfaction about the information provided as part of the consultation and the quality of the maps and how hard they were to understand, as well as the amount of detail on the day to day management of the woodland which does not come through in the documentation.

We have taken the comments received on board and they have been shared with relevant teams within Natural Resources Wales. The level of interest in this FRP shows how much the woodlands are valued locally and by visitors for recreation and health and wellbeing which is something we want to support and encourage.

With regard to recreation on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate we are continuing to liaise with users of the woodlands to support and encourage more sustainable recreation for all users, and to reduce any potential conflicts, such as through the North Cardiff Woodlands project, and the North Cardiff Trails group.

Forestry activities follow best practice to minimise impacts on the local environment, and although can sometimes look unsightly, is carried out in line with the UK Forestry Standard and UK Woodland Assurance Scheme. Felling work is planned by a multidisciplinary team including conservation to ensure we adhere to the law and remain compliant with guidelines set out in the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and within NRW guidance. Felling sites are continually monitored to ensure works are carried out sustainably and remain compliant and auditable to keep our accreditation intact. We are working to improve how we communicate with neighbours and communities when forestry operations are being planned and to communicate why we manage the woodlands in the ways we do, and will provide information, such as extraction routes, before work starts.

The approach taken in each woodland to restore native broadleaves depends on the current crop. If they are able to be thinned rather than clearfelled then that is our preferred option so that it is a gradual process. But if there is tree disease present, such as Phytopthora Ramorum, or if they have not been thinned previously and are now too old to do so safely and not risk wind blow, then clearfell is often the only option open to us to remove the conifers. But this is always carried out following the UK Forestry Standard guidance and carried out to impact the woodland as little as possible. Where there are important tree species, such as at Tair Onen, these will usually be retained during any cleafelling activity, as long as there is no danger of windblow from exposure after felling has happened.

We are working hard to balance the demands on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate and the three objectives as set out in the Woodlands for Wales: The Welsh Government’s Strategy for Woodlands and Trees (2018), that they provide benefits for communities, for biodiversity and the environment, and for the economy. We are also working hard to meet the challenges provided by diseases such as Phytophthora Ramoram, which has impacted larch, ash die back, and other diseases that are affecting the resilience of the woodlands, and the challenge posed by climate change and how this will affect woodlands.

There was a question about the categorisation of Ancient Woodland and how this can be restored. Ancient Woodland, as recorded on the Ancient Woodland Inventory, is woodland where there is evidence that the wood has been there since at least 1600, as evidenced through maps, and supported by indicator plant species. This can include conifer plantations where the previous wood was replanted with conifers and where there are indicator species that the native woodland can be restored, these are known as Plantations on Ancient Woodland Sites (PAWS). When we say the objectives will be to restore the ancient woodland it means to restore it back to native broadleaves or manage the woodland and encourage native flora.

We understand the dissatisfaction that some people have expressed about the level of information provided and the difficulty in understanding the maps and some of the terminology. We are taking on board this feedback and will be working to improve the level of information in the Forest Resource Plans and to make the mapping easier to understand in future consultations

We asked for your comments on the Forest Resource Plan for the Welsh Government Woodland Estate in the Rhondda Valley. The Forest Resource Plan is a high level plan that determines the overall management of the woodlands, setting out the long term objectives for each woodland (ancient woodland restoration, native woodland management, or standard forestry management, for example), and the general approach to any restocking, such as with native broadleaf or coniferous species. But the plan does not go into the specific day to day management of the estate, this is provided by our Land Management and Forest Operations Team whose work the plan informs.

We had a high level of responses to this consultation showing how much people value the woodlands in the Rhondda.

It was clear that there is a high level of use in some of the woodlands for mountain biking and other recreational pursuits, and many responses want to see this use supported more. There was also a perception this use could be negatively impacted by woodland management activities. There was also dissatisfaction with the wording used in the document that listed unauthorised mountain biking as anti-social behaviour in the same context as fly tipping.

However, there were also some responses that expressed concern about the level of mountain biking in some woodlands and the impact this could have on other users and the woodland itself.

There were many comments expressing concern about perceived negative impacts our felling activity has on the local environment and the communities near to the woodlands.

There was broad support for aims to restore ancient semi natural woodland on the estate and improve biodiversity within the woodlands, and there were some responses that wanted more native trees and less conifer on the estate.

There was some dissatisfaction on the information provided as part of the consultation and the quality of the maps and how hard they were to understand.

We have taken the comments received on board and they have been shared with relevant teams within Natural Resources Wales. The level of interest in this FRP shows how much the woodlands are valued locally and by visitors for recreation and health and wellbeing which is something we want to support and encourage.

We continue to work with The Bike Doctor at Barry Sidings Country Park to agree an approach to responsible mountain biking at Gelliwion that will support the mountain bikers as well as other users, and will allow woodland management activities to take place, and we are moving towards an agreeable solution for everyone.

We now realise putting mountain biking in the same sentence as fly tipping might not have been taken well, however this was focusing on irresponsible trail building and use of trails that damages the woodland ecosystem, puts other users in danger, and prevents management activities, not mountain biking in general. In future we will be clearer in our language when discussing such issues.

Forestry activities follow best practice to minimise impacts on the local environment, and although can sometimes look unsightly, is carried out in line with the UK Forestry Standard and UK Woodland Assurance Scheme. We do not deforest the land, as is often thought, but areas that have been felled will be left fallow for some time and then restocked or allowed to naturally regenerate with native species depending on the objective. Leaving the area fallow can have benefits to reduce pests and diseases, and the brash left can help to reduce run off and rot down to provide nutrients in the soil. We are working to improve how we communicate with neighbours and communities when forestry operations are being planned and to communicate why we manage the woodlands in the ways we do and the benefits it brings.

We are working hard to balance the demands on the Welsh Government Woodland Estate and the three objectives as set out in the Woodlands for Wales: The Welsh Government’s Strategy for Woodlands and Trees (2018), that they provide benefits for communities, for biodiversity and the environment, and for the economy. We are also working hard to meet the challenges provided by diseases such as Phytophthora Ramorum, which has impacted larch, ash die back, and other diseases that are affecting the resilience of the woodlands.

We understand the dissatisfaction that some people have expressed about the level of information provided and the difficulty in understanding the maps and some of the terminology. We are taking on board this feedback and will be working to improve the level of information in the Forest Resource Plans and to make the mapping easier to understand.

Natural Resources Wales (NRW) is reviewing its Enforcement and Sanctions Policy (ESP), which will make how it tackles environmental crime in all its forms easier to understand and more accessible to the public.

Our current policy on Enforcement and Prosecution was approved and published in March 2013. We recently established an internal expert group, including legal representatives, to run a review of this policy and its associated guidance.

Our revised ESP does not change our approach to enforcement. Principally, we engage with operators, individuals, and businesses, to educate and enable compliance or prevent harm; to put the environment first and to integrate good environmental practices into normal working methods.

Our review of this policy and associated guidance considers legislative changes for our core purpose, our new organisational structures, clarity on the use of civil sanctions (where we have those powers) and accessibility requirements, for publishing as a series of webpages.

Following the conclusion of the public consultation exercise we will assess and publish all relevant and valid consultation responses.

Subject to approval by internal governance at Enforcement Subgroup and Regulatory Business Board, our revised Enforcement and Prosecution Policy will then be published on our website.

We received 26 responses to the consultation from a wide range of people and companies including representatives of Angling clubs, rivers trusts, woodland trusts, a community councillor and community groups, Charites, The Farmers Union of Wales, RSPB Cymru, South Wales Fire and Rescue Service and a number of Ltd Companies.

Overall, the respondents supported the new Enforcement and Sanctions Policy and wanted to see NRW take enforcement action against environmental crime, and in particular river pollution, illegal fishing, damage to nature and fly tipping.

Many of the responses were concerned with our incident attendance and response siting particular instances where they had first-hand knowledge or were dissatisfied with NRW actions in that individual case.

Some responders whilst critical of NRW acknowledged that NRW is faced with a resource shortage / lack of boots on ground and that there was little point in having a ESP without the staff or resource to implement it.

The comments raised about resource and incident response whilst not forming part of this consultation will be fed back to our regulatory business board and may be used in future discussions with WG.

We intend to:

Publish the revised ESP

Review each response and provide a detailed report for our Regulatory business board

Share the responses with the relevant parts of the business i.e. Incident response

The following redacted document (annex 1) captures the themes of the responses we received in relation to this consultation.

We asked for your comments on the plans for the management of Crychan Forest over the next 10 years.

The Forest Resource Plan is the high level plan that determines the overall forest types (such as ancient woodland) and management prescriptions (such as continuous cover forestry) but does not go into the detail of the day to day management of the forest. This is provided by our Land Management and Forest Operations teams.

From the consultation response it was clear that the infomation around the access and recreation provision was lacking in clarity and detail.

There were positive comments on the proposals for an increase in riparian and ancient woodland and the move to increase the area of forest under continous cover.

There were also positive comments on the provision of habitat for protected species.

The current access and recreation provision also generated many positive comments.

We have prepared the following statement to provide additional detail and clarity around our provision of access and recreation in Crychan Forest. 

The Welsh Government  Woodland Estate (WGWE) is managed by Natural Resources Wales (NRW).  A significant proportion of the WGWE has been designated permissive access for walking, cycling and equestrian use and this includes Crychan forest.

Crychan forest contains 4 Car Parks, 5 waymarked Walking Trails  and 5 horse corals and also includes a network of public rights of ways including footpaths, bridleways and Unclassified roads. Both horse-riders and carriage drivers can make use of Crychan for riding under the terms of a Concordat between Natural Resources Wales and the British Horse Society (BHS). NRW are committed to retain this infrastructure for the continued recreational use of the forest.

NRW also work closely with the Crychan Forest Association who complete two trail inspections a year on a number of walking and horse riding routes in Crychan and Halfway.  They also promote the trails, the woodland and on occasions host events.

The forest roads within Crychan were constructed for the purpose of timber extraction and forestry operations that also provide permissive recreational access for walking, cycling and horse riding.  These forest roads are maintained prior to and following forestry operations  and provide wide and firm routes. These routes are suitable for horse riding and carriage driving. However, as these routes are within a working forest, certain locations may be closed off for safety reasons or during certain times of the year due to forestry operations. NRW therefore request that all users follow and obey any safety signage provided on site.

Any issues of anti social behaviour should be reported to our incident hotline (03000 65 3000) and any illegal activity to the hotline and/or the police via 101.